An astounding 40.3% of prisoners in Australia are back in prison within two years of release. We’ve been following The Conversation’s ‘Beyond Prison’ series on issues relating to prison conditions and post-prison release – this blog post summarises the best insights from across the articles.
Andrew Day advocates a smarter, evidence-based approach to rehabilitation in prisons. After tracing the history of rehabilitation from the 18th century to today, Day identifies the most important steps that need to be taken. Of these, it is crucial that low-risk offenders have minimal contact with higher-risk offenders. In order to achieve this, courts must use their diversionary powers to keep low-risk offenders out of prison. For maximum effectiveness of these diversionary tactics, community-based rehabilitation options need to be improved.
James Ogloff’s article elucidates the link between mental illness and prison. According to Ogloff, “[p]prisoners are two to three times as likely as those in the community to have a mental illness and are ten to 15 times more likely to have a psychotic disorder.” Even more disturbingly, research from Victoria (with similar research in other states) shows that “72% of male Aboriginal prisoners and 92% of female Aboriginal prisoners met the criteria for a diagnosis of a major mental illness.” Ogloff advocates screening for mental illness at all entry points into the criminal justice system (and well before the individual enters prison). He also highlights the need for better coordination of follow up care, including what would seem like a basic requirement: ensuring that all prisoners have the necessary psychiatric medication upon release.
Bronwyn Naylor strongly disputes the idea that the recent increase in incarceration rates is driven by an increase in crime. The fact is that crime rates are not uniformly rising. On the other hand, there is a much clearer connection between increased rates of imprisonment and increased levels of social inequality.
Kathryn Snow and Lynn Gillam expose the philosophical inconsistency underlying the current approach to incarceration. For example: they ask why, if prison is for the protection of the community, Aboriginal youths are locked up for unpaid driving fines? Their article opens up a bigger question: if incarceration isn’t keeping the community safe from recidivism, then how can we justify a prison system that is causing so much harm to individuals?