Specialist Media & Publication Defamation Lawyers in Sydney & Nationwide
Your Reputation Deserves the Same Standard of Accountability We Hold the Media To
Trusted & Recommended by Clients. LED by Accredited Specialists
4.6 – 120 Reviews
The O'Brien Advantage
Experience Against Media Defendants
We have acted in defamation matters involving major media organisations. That experience matters: media defendants are well-resourced and routinely argue a range of defences, including truth, honest opinion, and public interest. We know how those defences are run and how to respond to them.
Acting on Both Sides
We act for both plaintiffs and defendants in media defamation matters. We represent individuals and organisations defamed by media publications, and we also advise individuals and publishers who have been threatened with, or are facing, defamation claims. Both sides benefit from the same depth of strategic experience.
Publications Beyond the News
Defamation in published works extends well beyond news articles. We act in matters involving podcasts, blogs, academic publications, books, creative works, satire, and artistic content. The legal analysis differs depending on the nature of the publication and the defences available, we advise on all of them.
Strategic, Outcome-Focused Advice
Media defamation matters require careful strategic thinking. Suing a major media organisation is a significant step that carries costs and risks as well as potential rewards. We advise on whether to proceed, what outcome is achievable, and whether a negotiated resolution — a published apology, a correction, or a damages payment — is more appropriate than litigation.
TYPES OF MEDIA & PUBLICATION DEFAMATION WE HANDLE
Newspaper and Online News Defamation
Print and online news defamation is the most litigated area of defamation law in Australia. News organisations have access to significant legal resources and routinely rely on the defences of truth, honest opinion, and public interest. We act in claims against metropolitan and regional newspapers, online news outlets, and national mastheads, with experience navigating the specific defences and procedural steps that apply to media defendants.
Broadcast Media: Television and Radio Defamation
A defamatory statement broadcast on television or radio can reach hundreds of thousands of people in a single airing. We act in matters involving current affairs programs, news bulletins, talkback radio, and documentary content. The broadcast context creates particular evidentiary considerations, we advise on preservation of broadcast records, transcripts, and online archives.
Podcast Defamation
Podcasts have grown substantially as a publication medium, with some programmes reaching audiences comparable to mainstream radio. False statements of fact made in podcast episodes — including in interview content, commentary, and investigative series, are subject to defamation law in the same way as broadcast media. Podcast content is often permanently archived and indexed online, which affects the assessment of ongoing harm.
Blog and Online Publication Defamation
Individual bloggers, opinion writers, and online commentators are subject to defamation law in the same way as professional journalists and major media outlets. The absence of editorial oversight does not reduce the liability of the publisher. We act in matters involving individual blogs, content aggregators, online magazines, and community news platforms.
Satire and Artistic Criticism
Satire and artistic criticism attract specific defences, honest opinion and, in some cases, public interest. However, content that goes beyond genuine satirical comment and conveys false imputations of fact about a real person remains actionable. The line between protected satire and defamation is context-specific, and we advise on where a particular publication falls.
Our Defamation Team - Led By Stewart O'Connell
Led by One of Sydney’s Most Experienced Defamation Solicitors
Our defamation practice is led by Stewart O’Connell. Stewart has experience in defamation matters involving individuals and organisations across online and offline publications. He has represented hundreds of people in defamation claims, and was responsible for the highest defamation award in the Northern Territory. He also led a High Court case that changed defamation law by making media companies responsible for comments others made on their social media accounts.
Stewart has represented clients in defamation matters against well-known media and press organisations, including The Sydney Morning Herald, The Daily Telegraph, The Daily Mail, 7News, and The Financial Review, plus many more.
No matter the platform or the scale of the harm, we bring the same standard of preparation and advocacy to every matter.
O’Brien Criminal & Civil Solicitors is led by Law Society Accredited Specialists in Criminal and Civil Law, practitioners assessed and verified for expertise in their fields.
The Defamation Claim Process
1. Free Case Assessment
Contact us for a free, no-obligation review of the publication you believe is defamatory. We assess the imputations, the likely serious harm threshold, the defences available to the publisher, and the strategic options open to you. We will give you an honest view of the strengths and weaknesses of your position.
2. Evidence Preservation and Publication Review
We draft and serve a concerns notice on the publisher. For major media organisations, this is a well-understood process with predictable timelines. We calibrate our notice to achieve the outcome most likely to serve your interests: a prompt apology and correction, a damages payment, or both.
3. Concerns Notice or Pre-Litigation Strategy
Where the legal analysis supports proceeding, we draft and serve a concerns notice. We advise on the strategic approach: whether to pursue resolution quietly or to put the matter on a formal legal footing immediately.
4. Litigation or Resolution
Many media defamation matters resolve through negotiation at the concerns notice or early litigation stage. Where they do not, we litigate. We keep you informed at every step and advise on the risks and prospects as the matter develops.
Remember: Defamation claims are legally complex and time-sensitive. Seeking expert advice as soon as possible gives you the best chance of securing justice and protecting your reputation.
Eight Steps to Take After Media Defamation
Five Steps to Take After Media Defamation
- Preserve the Publication
- Save a copy of the article, broadcast, or podcast episode before it can be amended or removed. For online content, capture the URL, the date and time of publication, the headline, the content in full, and any social media sharing that has occurred. For broadcast content, request a recording or transcript from the outlet or use a third-party archive service.
- Note the Imputations
- Identify precisely what the publication says or implies about you. Defamation is about imputations, not just the literal words used. A publication can convey a false imputation through innuendo, context, or juxtaposition even without making a direct false statement. Making a note of what you believe the publication implies is useful context for your first meeting with a lawyer.
- 3. Record the Immediate Impact
- If you have received messages, calls, or communications about the publication from colleagues, clients, or community members, keep a record of them. If you have experienced any professional or personal consequences, a lost opportunity, a changed relationship, a statement from an employer, document those immediately.
- Do Not Contact the Journalist or Publisher Directly
- Do not call the journalist, email the editor, or post a response on the outlet's website or social media channels before speaking to a lawyer. Your communications may affect your legal position and may be used in any subsequent proceedings.
- Avoid Public Comment
- Do not comment on the publication publicly, on your own social media, in interviews, or in any other forum, until you have legal advice. Public responses can inadvertently republish the defamatory imputations, complicate your claim, or give the publisher arguments it would not otherwise have.
- Contact a Defamation Lawyer as Soon as Possible
- Defamation claims in NSW must generally be brought within one year of the date of publication under the Limitation Act 1969 (NSW). For ongoing publications, such as an article that remains online and continues to be found in search results, advice on the applicable limitation period should be sought promptly.
Voices of Justice: Client Reviews
Read what clients of O’Brien Criminal and Civil Lawyers have said in Google Reviews after we’ve helped clients restore their good names.
Wilson Tighe is the best criminal lawyer in Sydney. I highly recommended him not only for his highly competence in laws but also for his kindness and humanity. We thank him a lot for his help in our matter.
Used O'Brien solicitors for both of my criminal law cases which they managed to get all charges dismissed when I was looking down the barrel of 18 months jail. Then even more impressively ran my civil claim vs the police and I got a very good outcome and substantial pay out. Easy to talk to and actually listened and took my opinion into consideration which is a first. Highly recommend!
Dedicated, diligent and efficient! I had the good luck of being represented by O'Brien lawyers resulting in a favourable outcome. If you are looking for lawyers to represent you in a difficult criminal case, then look no further.
The quality of service provided far exceeded my expectations. The elegance and professionalism in which this firm conducts itself is to be admired. They don't treat you as just another client. I cannot recommend them enough for criminal and civil matters as they excel at both. Special thank you to Peter & Elle, I will never forget the impact this outcome has had on my life.
I recently had to engage the firm to represent me in a criminal matter. I initially liaised with Tim Rayner (criminal paralegal) who assisted with handling my case, whom I found to be professional and always responsive. Elliot Rowe (criminal solicitor) was assigned as my legal counsel. I highly commend Elliot for his consistently methodical and prudent handling of my case and his calm and patient demeanour, which provided some measure of reassurance to me during a particularly distressing period in my life.
I found myself facing the criminal justice system for the first (and hopefully only) time. Contacted O'Brien solicitors based on the number of positive reviews and was put through to Elliot. His patience with me was outstanding, helping me navigate and understand what lay ahead. Never felt rushed. He was very objective and not judgemental in any way. Gave me plenty of options which allowed me to arrive at a fair outcome. At sentencing he spent the whole day with me in court. I consider Elliot to be more an ally not just a lawyer. Can't recommend Elliot highly enough.
Me and my family have been working with O'Brien Criminal and Civil Solicitors in regards to representing us for criminal defence in two cases. In both cases our solicitor Wilson Tighe was professional, transparent and provided us with professional advice throughout the procedures. I highly recommend their services to others.
Sidnie was thorough, informative and well versed. Her dedication and attention to detail, and ability to force the truth to be seen, were the reason I got the result that I should have. Highly recommended her and this firm.
O’Brien Criminal and Civil Solicitors have been an outstanding service to me in both criminal and civil matters, if anyone or any organisation needs professional law support, this is an absolute dedication of people who have passionately studied and become experienced experts in getting results, thank you I am so grateful.
O'Brien Criminal and Civil Solicitors is hands down the most reliable, understanding and professional firm I have dealt with. Peter, Tim and Wilson have helped me and my family through the roughest time and were able to provide us with an amazing outcome. I would definitely highly recommend this firm to anyone that requires Solicitors that offer professionalism and care. THANK YOU SO VERY MUCH.
I highly recommend O'Brien solicitors, especially Peter O'Brien and Wilson Tighe. They went above and beyond. Easily contactable anytime I had a question, diligent, kept us up to date and always communicated each step and options with me.
As a client of O'Brien Criminal & Civil Solicitors, I am extremely satisfied with the services provided by Tim Rayner and the entire team. From the initial consultation to the final resolution of my legal matter, I have been impressed with the level of professionalism, expertise, and attention to detail demonstrated by everyone involved.
Media & Publication Defamation: Frequently Asked Questions
Media defamation occurs when a publication, whether in a newspaper, on television, in a podcast, on a blog, or in any other medium, contains a statement that conveys a false imputation about an identifiable person, is communicated to at least one person other than the subject, and causes or is likely to cause serious harm to that person's reputation. The Defamation Act 2005 (NSW) governs defamation claims in NSW and has been adopted with some modifications across other Australian jurisdictions. It applies to all forms of publication, including broadcast, print, online, and creative works.
Media organisations typically rely on one or more of the following defences under the Defamation Act:
- Truth (Justification): The publication was substantially true. This is the most common defence for news media.
- Honest Opinion: The statement was a genuine expression of opinion based on proper material.
- Public Interest: The publication was on a matter of public interest and the defendant reasonably believed it was in the public interest to publish it (introduced in the 2021 reforms as a replacement for the old "qualified privilege" for media defendants).
- Contextual Truth: The defamatory imputation is substantially true in the context of other true imputations in the same publication.
Succeeding on any of these defences requires the defendant to establish the relevant facts. Whether a particular defence is available and how strong it is depends on the specific publication and circumstances of your matter.
Under s 10A of the Defamation Act 2005 (NSW), a plaintiff must generally prove that the publication caused, or is likely to cause, serious harm to their reputation. This threshold was introduced in the 2021 reforms. For a publication with a large audience and significant online reach, the serious harm threshold may be easier to satisfy than for a publication with limited circulation. Our lawyers assess the threshold in every matter, taking into account the nature of the imputations, the size and nature of the audience, and the plaintiff's specific circumstances.
Yes, in some circumstances. Satire that is clearly understood by a reasonable reader as comment or exaggeration, rather than a statement of fact, is generally protected by the honest opinion defence. However, content that, despite its fictional or satirical framing, conveys a false imputation of fact about a real, identifiable person remains actionable. As the Arts Law Centre of Australia notes, defamation claims have been pursued over novels, poems, cartoons, photographs, and artistic criticism. The test is how a reasonable person, in the relevant audience, would understand the publication.
Damages in defamation matters may be assessed by reference to: the seriousness of the imputations; the reach of the publication; the harm to the plaintiff's reputation and hurt feelings; and any special damages for proven financial loss. There is a statutory cap on general damages in NSW, which is updated periodically. In some matters, aggravated damages may be available where the defendant's conduct increased the harm. Every matter is different, and we provide a realistic assessment of damages potential at the outset.
Under the Limitation Act 1969 (NSW), defamation claims must generally be commenced within one year of the date of publication. For online publications, questions about the applicable publication date in the context of ongoing availability are a developing area of law. Courts have a discretion to extend the limitation period in appropriate circumstances, but extensions are not guaranteed. If you are aware of a defamatory publication that is approaching or has passed the one-year mark, contact us immediately for advice on whether an extension is available.
Get Expert Legal Advice - Free Initial Consultation
Speak directly with our experienced legal team about your case. We're here to protect your rights and guide you through every step.
Facing a similar legal challenge? Our experienced team has successfully handled cases like this. Contact us today for your free consultation.
