The STMP has always been racially biased, discriminatory, and likely unlawful

The STMP has always been racially biased, discriminatory, and likely unlawful

NSW Parliament has released documents further exposing the blatantly unregulated practices of NSW Police’s secret blacklist.

The Suspect Target Management Program (STMP) has come under regular fire for its racially discriminatory and likely unlawful pre-crime powers.

Background: What is STMP, when did it start?

The STMP is a secret NSW Police policy that police say are “designed to reduce crime among high risk individuals”. The policy allows police to conduct random personal searches and home visits at all hours of the day to anyone on the list. Instead of targeting serious offenders, the STMP disproportionately targets young children and especially young First Nations children.

The STMP has been in operation since the early 2000s. Since then, there has been little transparency. It is wholly unclear what the criteria for inclusion on the list is and  how police allocate risk categorisation. Further, police target a person without even formally notifying that person that they are on the list.


There is no method to confirm. There is no method to appeal.

People simply are vulnerable to police abuse without any method of recourse.

“Unrestricted discretion” to place people on the STMP

 The documents obtained by the Public Interest Advocacy Centre (PIAC) detail established understandings of its questionable lawfulness.

According to PIAC, the documents reveal the following:

  1. ‘Target’ selection process is unguarded to bias. This is due to police having unrestricted discretion to select people without basing them on the Crime Severity Index.
  2. The STMP ‘Disruption Toolkit’ encourages officers to issue Traffic Infringement Notices and Defect Notices because ‘restricting access to vehicles limits offending behaviour.’ This same policy allows officers to take pictures of ‘targets’ in public, “for intelligence purposes, for instance to document tattoos” but also to allow officers to “run through facial recognition”.
  3. Officers get encouragement to “build rapport and trust,”. However, simply put, that is to manipulate relationships with young individuals and their families for surveillance purposes.

No accountability, No transparency

Many critics over the years voiced for the need for the discontinuation of the STMP, including Redfern Legal Centre.

PIAC Principal Solicitor Camilla Pandolfini emphasises the need to divert children away from police and prisons.

STMP Suspect Target Management ProgramWe’ve known for decades that exposing children to repeated, invasive interactions with police is harmful.  We need to be diverting young people from the criminal justice system if we want better outcomes, not increasing their interaction with it,” she said.

‘We urge the NSW Government to cease use of the STMP against children and ensure it isn’t used disproportionately against First Nations people. How much longer can we keep doing the same things and expect a different result?’

“The tool needs to stop being used by police to ensure that people can live their life without constant police monitoring.”

If you believe that you are on the STMP list and want to seek legal advice give us a call on (02) 9261 4281. The first consultation is always free.

+ posts

Nicole Byrne

Content Creator | Media Coordinator
O'Brien Criminal & Civil Solicitors

author avatar
Nicole Byrne
Nicole Byrne Content Creator | Media Coordinator O'Brien Criminal & Civil Solicitors

Recommended articles

Privacy obligations in New South Wales

Privacy laws in New South Wales

Protection of privacy is an ever-growing area of concern in the digital age. While there is no current tort for breach of privacy, there are statutory provisions which govern the

Read More

O’Brien Criminal & Civil Solicitors
p: 02 9261 4281
a: Level 4, 219-223 Castlereagh St,
Sydney NSW 2000

Scroll to Top