The Hannah Thomas case has made headlines again after NSW Police asked for more time, again, to defend officers.
Last week, our civil lawyer Anavi Arya appeared in the NSW Supreme Court as the state sought a further extension to prepare its defence, marking the second time police have requested additional time in this matter. Arya described the ongoing delays as “quite excessive,” noting that our side has already fulfilled every request made by the defence, including the provision of medical records, tax details, and psychological evidence.
Read our other civil case studies.
Background: What Happened to Hannah Thomas
Hannah Thomas, a federal Greens candidate and human rights lawyer, suffered a serious eye injury requiring surgery when she was arrested on 27 June 2025 during a protest over weapons being supplied to Israel. She was allegedly punched in the face by a male NSW Police officer during the arrest.
All criminal charges against Hannah were subsequently withdrawn by the DPP on 9 September 2025. Meanwhile, Senior Constable Christopher Davis has been charged with assault occasioning actual bodily harm and recklessly causing grievous bodily harm over the incident. He has pleaded not guilty, with a hearing set for February next year.

Hannah Thomas: Civil Claim Against Police
Hannah’s civil claim against NSW Police, filed in the NSW Supreme Court, alleges malicious prosecution, misfeasance in public office, and collateral abuse of process. It forms part of a broader push for accountability over what her legal team has described as the unlawful and violent treatment of peaceful protesters.
A magistrate has already ordered police to pay costs of $39,435 to four demonstrators arising from the same protest, of which Hannah received $21,000.
What Happened In Court Last Week
In Thursday’s hearing, Arya told the court that our side had already provided the extra details supporting the claim that were requested at the previous court date. “The state has had enough time to consider a defence,” she said.
The police’s lawyer, James Knez, argued that the members of the police force referenced in the lawsuit were so senior that the matter required more time to prepare, stating that “the exact torts they’re said to have committed haven’t been pleaded.”
Court Registrar Jennifer Hedge was direct in her response: “It shouldn’t matter who they are.”
Despite our objections, the extension was granted. The matter will return to court on 5 May 2026.
Our Position
At O’Brien Solicitors, we believe no one, regardless of rank or seniority, is above accountability. Hannah has cooperated fully with every step of this process. She has provided her medical records, financial information, and psychological evidence. We are ready.
We will continue to fight for the outcome she deserves.
If you have experienced unlawful arrest, excessive force, or police misconduct, our civil law team is here to help. Contact us for a confidential consultation.
Need A Lawyer For Suing NSW Police For Ecessive Force?
Have you been unlawfully arrested, subjected to excessive force, or wrongfully prosecuted? You may have grounds for a civil claim against police. Our team has decades of experience holding authorities accountable, and we’re not afraid to take on the most senior officers.
Call us today on 02 9261 4281 or book a free consultation to speak to a civil lawyer.

- Nicole Byrne
- Nicole Byrne
- Nicole Byrne
- Nicole Byrne
- Nicole Byrne
- Nicole Byrne
- Nicole Byrne
- Nicole Byrne
- Nicole Byrne
- Nicole Byrne
- Nicole Byrne
- Nicole Byrne
- Nicole Byrne
- Nicole Byrne
- Nicole Byrne
- Nicole Byrne
- Nicole Byrne
- Nicole Byrne
- Nicole Byrne
- Nicole Byrne
- Nicole Byrne
- Nicole Byrne
- Nicole Byrne
- Nicole Byrne
- Nicole Byrne
- Nicole Byrne
