Specialist Lawyers for Defamatory Google & Online Reviews in Sydney & Nationwide
One False Review Can Cost You Clients, Contracts, and Credibility
Trusted & Recommended by Clients. LED by Accredited Specialists
4.6 – 120 Reviews
The O'Brien Advantage
We Understand the Business Impact
False reviews do not just affect feelings, they affect revenue. We advise businesses and professionals on the legal pathways available and assess the serious harm threshold against the specific harm your business has experienced or is likely to experience. Our advice is practical and commercial, not just legal.
Specialist Defamation Lawyers
Online review defamation requires a lawyer who understands both the legal framework and the mechanics of how review platforms operate. Our defamation team, led by Stewart O'Connell, has acted in online review matters across major platforms.
Honest Assessment of Your Options
Not every negative review is defamatory. A review expressing genuine opinion, even if harsh, may be protected. A review that states false facts about your business or conduct is different. We assess the distinction clearly, advise on whether your matter crosses the serious harm threshold, and give you an honest view of your prospects before you commit to any course of action.
Flexible Payment Options
We offer flexible payment arrangements to ensure cost is not a barrier to accessing expert legal representation. Contact us to discuss your options during your free initial consultation.
TYPES OF ONLINE REVIEW DEFAMATION WE HANDLE
Google Business Reviews
Google reviews appear directly in Google Maps and Google Search results for your business name, making them among the most visible and damaging forms of online publication. A false review that attributes specific misconduct to a business or professional can satisfy the serious harm threshold under s 10A of the Defamation Act 2005 (NSW). We advise on formal Google reporting, legal notices, and court proceedings to obtain removal or compensation.
Competitor Reviews
False reviews posted by a competitor are among the most actionable forms of online defamation. Where a review appears to have been posted by a commercial competitor rather than a genuine customer, this affects both the defamation analysis and any separate claim under the Australian Consumer Law for misleading or deceptive conduct.
Reviews on Social Media and Forums
Some of the most damaging reviews appear not on dedicated review platforms but in Facebook community groups, Reddit forums, or industry-specific communities. These publications are also subject to defamation law. The audience may be highly targeted, for example, a local parents’ group reviewing a family business, and the reputational harm in those contexts can be immediate and severe.
Trustpilot, Yelp, and Other Review Platforms
Defamatory content on Trustpilot, Yelp, True Local, ProductReview.com.au, and similar platforms is governed by the same legal framework as Google reviews. The 2024 reforms introduced a framework for digital intermediaries, including online services and review platforms.
Anonymous Reviews
A significant proportion of defamatory reviews are posted under pseudonyms or anonymous accounts. Identifying the author requires preliminary discovery mechanisms, court orders compelling Google or the relevant platform to disclose subscriber information. We have experience obtaining these orders in NSW and advise on the process and realistic timeframes.
Our Defamation Team - Led By Stewart O'Connell
Led by One of Sydney’s Most Experienced Defamation Solicitors
Our defamation practice is led by Stewart O’Connell. Stewart has experience in defamation matters involving individuals and organisations across online and offline publications. He has represented hundreds of people in defamation claims, and was responsible for the highest defamation award in the Northern Territory. He also led a High Court case that changed defamation law by making media companies responsible for comments others made on their social media accounts.
Stewart has represented clients in defamation matters against well-known media and press organisations, including The Sydney Morning Herald, The Daily Telegraph, The Daily Mail, 7News, and The Financial Review, plus many more.
No matter the platform or the scale of the harm, we bring the same standard of preparation and advocacy to every matter.
O’Brien Criminal & Civil Solicitors is led by Law Society Accredited Specialists in Criminal and Civil Law, practitioners assessed and verified for expertise in their fields.
The Defamation Claim Process
1. Free Case Assessment
Contact us for a free, no-obligation review of the review or reviews you believe are defamatory. We assess the imputations, the likely serious harm threshold, whether the reviewer is identifiable, and what legal pathways are available. We will explain your options at the first call.
2. Evidence Preservation and Platform Investigation
Before pursuing any pathway, we preserve the evidence: screenshots, URLs, metadata, engagement data, and any contextual information about the reviewer. We also assess platform reporting and removal processes and advise whether to use them.
3. Legal Notice or Preliminary Discovery
Where the reviewer is known, we issue a concerns notice under the Defamation Act. Where they are anonymous, we move to identify them through preliminary discovery. Both processes happen quickly once you instruct us.
4. Litigation or Resolution
Many online review defamation matters resolve through platform removal and legal correspondence. Where they do not, we litigate. We keep you informed throughout and advise on each decision point as it arises.
Remember: Defamation claims are legally complex and time-sensitive. Seeking expert advice as soon as possible gives you the best chance of securing justice and protecting your reputation.
WHAT TO DO ABOUT A DEFAMATORY REVIEW
Seven Steps to Take When a False Review is Damaging Your Reputation:
- Screenshot and Preserve the Review
- Capture the full review including the reviewer's name or handle, the star rating, the date, and any responses. If the review is on Google, photograph the map listing as it appears in search results. Reviews can be removed by the platform or the reviewer before you can act, preserve the evidence first.
- Do Not Respond Emotionally
- A defensive or aggressive public response draws attention to the review and can make your position worse. Avoid public arguments, naming the reviewer, or making threats in the comments section. Speak to a lawyer first.
- Record the Business Impact
- If you can connect lost clients, cancelled bookings, or reduced enquiries to the review, document it. Screenshots of communication from prospective clients, records of referrals that did not proceed, or drops in enquiry volume around the date of publication can support the serious harm assessment.
- Note Any Information About the Reviewer
- If you recognise the reviewer or have any information about who they might be, record it separately. Even partial identification, the timing of a transaction, a specific complaint they made verbally, can assist in preliminary discovery if needed.
- Do Not Attempt to Report the Review Without Legal Advice
- Platform reporting systems vary in effectiveness. A formal legal notice carries more weight than a standard user report. Contact a defamation lawyer before submitting any platform complaint, so the communication is structured to support your legal position.
- Contact a Defamation Lawyer as Soon as Possible
- Contact a defamation lawyer promptly, as limitation periods can apply. Early advice also gives you the best chance of removing the content before it causes further harm. Contact us for a free case assessment.
Voices of Justice: Client Reviews
Read what clients of O’Brien Criminal and Civil Lawyers have said in Google Reviews after we’ve helped clients restore their good names.
Wilson Tighe is the best criminal lawyer in Sydney. I highly recommended him not only for his highly competence in laws but also for his kindness and humanity. We thank him a lot for his help in our matter.
Used O'Brien solicitors for both of my criminal law cases which they managed to get all charges dismissed when I was looking down the barrel of 18 months jail. Then even more impressively ran my civil claim vs the police and I got a very good outcome and substantial pay out. Easy to talk to and actually listened and took my opinion into consideration which is a first. Highly recommend!
Dedicated, diligent and efficient! I had the good luck of being represented by O'Brien lawyers resulting in a favourable outcome. If you are looking for lawyers to represent you in a difficult criminal case, then look no further.
The quality of service provided far exceeded my expectations. The elegance and professionalism in which this firm conducts itself is to be admired. They don't treat you as just another client. I cannot recommend them enough for criminal and civil matters as they excel at both. Special thank you to Peter & Elle, I will never forget the impact this outcome has had on my life.
I recently had to engage the firm to represent me in a criminal matter. I initially liaised with Tim Rayner (criminal paralegal) who assisted with handling my case, whom I found to be professional and always responsive. Elliot Rowe (criminal solicitor) was assigned as my legal counsel. I highly commend Elliot for his consistently methodical and prudent handling of my case and his calm and patient demeanour, which provided some measure of reassurance to me during a particularly distressing period in my life.
I found myself facing the criminal justice system for the first (and hopefully only) time. Contacted O'Brien solicitors based on the number of positive reviews and was put through to Elliot. His patience with me was outstanding, helping me navigate and understand what lay ahead. Never felt rushed. He was very objective and not judgemental in any way. Gave me plenty of options which allowed me to arrive at a fair outcome. At sentencing he spent the whole day with me in court. I consider Elliot to be more an ally not just a lawyer. Can't recommend Elliot highly enough.
Me and my family have been working with O'Brien Criminal and Civil Solicitors in regards to representing us for criminal defence in two cases. In both cases our solicitor Wilson Tighe was professional, transparent and provided us with professional advice throughout the procedures. I highly recommend their services to others.
Sidnie was thorough, informative and well versed. Her dedication and attention to detail, and ability to force the truth to be seen, were the reason I got the result that I should have. Highly recommended her and this firm.
O’Brien Criminal and Civil Solicitors have been an outstanding service to me in both criminal and civil matters, if anyone or any organisation needs professional law support, this is an absolute dedication of people who have passionately studied and become experienced experts in getting results, thank you I am so grateful.
O'Brien Criminal and Civil Solicitors is hands down the most reliable, understanding and professional firm I have dealt with. Peter, Tim and Wilson have helped me and my family through the roughest time and were able to provide us with an amazing outcome. I would definitely highly recommend this firm to anyone that requires Solicitors that offer professionalism and care. THANK YOU SO VERY MUCH.
I highly recommend O'Brien solicitors, especially Peter O'Brien and Wilson Tighe. They went above and beyond. Easily contactable anytime I had a question, diligent, kept us up to date and always communicated each step and options with me.
As a client of O'Brien Criminal & Civil Solicitors, I am extremely satisfied with the services provided by Tim Rayner and the entire team. From the initial consultation to the final resolution of my legal matter, I have been impressed with the level of professionalism, expertise, and attention to detail demonstrated by everyone involved.
Google & Online Reviews Defamation — Frequently Asked Questions
No, not always. A one-star review that expresses a genuine opinion, even if harsh or unfair, may be protected by honest opinion under the Defamation Act 2005 (NSW). A review that makes false factual claims, for example, about fraud, theft, or misconduct, may be defamatory. The distinction between opinion and false fact is critical, and it turns on how the review would be understood by a reasonable person reading it. Our lawyers assess this as the first step in any matter.
Under s 10A of the Defamation Act 2005 (NSW), a plaintiff must prove that the publication caused, or is likely to cause, serious harm to their reputation. For a corporation, this means serious financial loss. Courts may find the threshold met where false reviews cause serious harm, especially if they are widely seen or linked to proven business loss. The assessment is fact-specific and depends on the nature of the imputations, the reach of the review, and the circumstances of the plaintiff.
The 2024 reforms introduced a new framework for digital intermediaries and online services. Whether Google or another platform is liable in a particular matter depends on the specific facts and circumstances. This is a developing area of law. We advise on whether a claim against the platform is available and strategic in your specific situation.
Where a review is posted under a pseudonym or an account with no identifying information, you can apply to the court for a preliminary discovery order compelling the platform to disclose the subscriber information linked to that account. Courts in NSW have granted these orders in defamation matters where there is a reasonable basis to believe the content is defamatory. The process requires a formal court application and can take time. We advise on the process and manage the application on your behalf.
If your claim succeeds, you may be entitled to general damages and, in some cases, special damages. You may also be entitled to an injunction requiring removal of the content and, in some cases, a published apology or correction.
The amount recoverable depends on the seriousness of the imputations, the reach of the publication, the extent of actual harm, and other factors.
Yes. A competitor who posts a false review about your business may face both a defamation claim and a claim under the Australian Consumer Law for misleading or deceptive conduct. In some cases, both defamation and ACL claims may be available. Evidence that a review was posted by a competitor, including IP data, timing analysis, or account patterns, can support both claims. We advise on available legal options based on the facts.
Get Expert Legal Advice - Free Initial Consultation
Speak directly with our experienced legal team about your case. We're here to protect your rights and guide you through every step.
Facing a similar legal challenge? Our experienced team has successfully handled cases like this. Contact us today for your free consultation.
